Governments focused on a primary perspective of promoting/encouraging socialized forms of charity show themselves to be employed by a bureaucracy which attracts those who are particularly immune, calloused or desensitized to a host of wide-ranging social needs and concerns; thus revealing a presently established deficiency in its ability to best serve the public. When the public is subjected to a government chain of command acting as a multi-level hierarchy extending through the local, state and federal sectors of governance in a bureaucratic form of "trickle down" economic theory; the conduits of plumbing to serve the public's needs is often regulated by a distribution valve that is under repair, being used in another location, systematically applied along a labyrinthine channeling system meant to avoid detection by way of artificialized complexifications or legalized jargon, is waiting for an operator to return from lunch, the operator is away from their desk, or in a meeting, or on holiday, on sick leave, went to a funeral, are running late, is busy being used by another customer, the department's machine for dispensed queuing numbers is out and new numbers will be ordered as soon as the proper request forms are sent out after being printed up by a printer no longer in business... or the valve has slowed to a drip... because Congress is too busy voting itself in a raise and other benefits.
For example, in our attempts to disclose the perceptions that the military exhibits the functionality of a Socialistically-Communist welfare system, repeated arguments to the contrary are dismissively reprehensive by stating that Socialism and Communism are types of economic systems and the Military is not. However, they do not point out that the Military is a type of government Welfare program and that the government itself is sustained by taxes, and that many businesses and religions are subsidized by the public's coffers through tax exemption or bailouts which obscure poor management, but many politicians own stock in a company or industry and do not want to suffer a loss, whereby support is given long enough for them to cash in (in order to cash out from the investment).
In very many scenarios the government/government agencies attempt to engage in tactics to increase its revenue within the scope of its domain, much in the manner as many an unemployed or temporary worker adopts revenue-generating tactics in such behaviors as a general handyman or someone seeking extra income by participating in the selling of scrap metal, yard/garage sales, flea-market proprietorship, internet sales, dot-com schemes, etc..., though the government's methodology is to employ schemes related to industry, international bartering, trade tariffs, privatizing basic needs in order to permit individualized exploitation of the public, etc...
Because the military does not normally engage in direct tactics to increase its income (though intentional indirect acts are well-known), an analysis of its functionality must primarily be viewed from an humanitarian and social/cultural perspective. As such, when we look at the following examples, there is a direct correlation between the military and Socialism, Communism, and Welfare. The lack of a voting system clearly distinguishes the military as a poorly practiced democracy, though it laughably claims many of its actions are directed towards establishing, upholding or protecting the rights of people to practice a democracy (i.e. to "make the world safe for Democracy")... yet it does not appreciably embrace an internalized promotion and practice of what it preaches. Nor does the usage of contracted services diminish from the provisional dichotomy distinguishing Military and civilian control of services meant specifically for military personnel and their family members.
Because of some belief in a "preventing public panic" preconception; instead of letting the public be aware of an increasing shortage of food or fresh water, various tactics might be used to conceal reality similar to the "facing" of goods on shelves in order to give an impression of fullness instead of the existence of a minimalist approach to storing inventory. In other words, it is but one of many fascades used not only by business, but government and religion as well. For example, displays of foodstuffs in stores can be reduced through suggested problems of employee-based product ordering or delivery, that become routine occurrences or can be defined as a reduction in inventory to give a more-often-used selection at a better price. In other words, various tactics of lying and product manipulation, substitution, repackaging, etc., can occur (such as the artificiality of contract creation used in stock market gaming techniques which exhibit maneuvers suggestive of holding and playing cards in an elaborate poker game amongst those practicing various concealments as a personal tactic)... to conceal the reality of an increasing resource reduction because of multiple people knowing (or unwittingly) creating an atmosphere of illusion characteristic of a cinematically portrayed sting or burglary operation carried out by the 1% robber barons working together... when necessary, as a trust to monopolize a given opportunity either developed as a natural course of business or intentionally created artificially such as in the case of instigating conditions for war or privation that they can exploit, because the public is viewed as game pieces in their economically-oriented chess match.
Each of the above examples represent cataloguing systems related to an overall mental capacity and functionality of human behavior under incrementally deteriorating environmental conditions which cause the adaptable physiology of humanity to construct variably adjusting rationalizations that make the best of a bad situation... that is becoming incrementally worse which will create dramatic changes in the various inventory systems of humanity.
Such a perspective exhibits an antiquated mindset within the constraints of a consciousness which lacks an available appreciation of human cognition from which arises a world-view creating historically repeating episodes of human strife— when the realization of trichotomies (such as the Hegelian "Thesis/Anti-thesis... Synthesis") and other formulas of 'complex simplicities' that import the derived fundamental basics of differentiated thinking in different eras amongst different peoples... are of greater value and can be usefully applied to further a larger global magnanimity, when the obsession with dualities in their many faces (biasness, dichotomy, dualism, binary, opposites, pairing, etc...), can be put in their place within a more comprehensive awareness of the constraints of biology influencing a conservation law related to thinking as a system of "adjustable rationalization" acting as a gyroscopic mechanism in an incrementally decaying planetary system.
(such as Capitalism)
— and —
"State ownership (of capital) in/used for the means of production"
(such as Socialism... or Communistic collectivism under State control);
are expressions and extensions of an ancient "two"-framed mentality cloaked in modernized jargon, idioms, and attendant rationales that social reformers must pursue a paradigm shift in their thinking in order to advantage themselves with a greater consciousness of expanded appreciation of the global human condition within a restricted planetary environment headed along an incremental course of decay.
However, such a perspective is not appreciably advanced by attempts to introduce a presumed "three"-framed formula consisting of a "Mixed economy" juxtaposed between Capitalism and Socialism (or Communism) and are often labeled as Market... Mixed... Planned:
(Very often, different social theories articulate endorsement of one or another of these economic systems in that fluid social conditions may call for a fluidic approach to the type of market system of best use under given circumstances... many of which are not foreseeable.)
While the usage of a "three" formula would appear to provide an advantage over the constraint of a "two" formula, it actually represents a superficiality of economic theory because the definition of "ownership" has not likewise been advanced beyond its dichotomy of "Private and Public". Though some attempt to extricate the representation of a "Personal" brand of ownership, they do not as well itemize the definition of what it is meant as a separate entity' thus leaving interested others having to support a suppositional instead of a declarative statement that goes beyond the definitions encompassed in a macro/micro-economics divisioning. What typically occurs is a definition which overlooks the usage of some personalized amalgamation which can alternatively be described as a fusion or concretion of a perception rendered into an ideological conservation effect being triggered by an increasing population that is increasing the loss of resources which causes more of us to scramble for some purportedly reachable higher ground of wealth, religion, or philosophically applicable altruism sometimes referred to as a humanistic brand of Utopianism; leaving the majority trying to advance up an economic hill lined with a labyrinthine arrangement of business, government and religious palisades governed by arbitrarily initiated time- or variously listed demographic constraints. What is produced is an elaborate socialized gaming system with the odds weighted heavily against the general public whose only sanctuary is the depth of their illusions... if not delusions.
The presence of three alternatives does little to persuade many individuals away for using some personalized "two"-framed orientation that prefers to use the two numinous descriptions of "Anonymous Market Forces" or "Automated Market Systems" instead of detailing or attempting to detail the levers, controls, dials and other generalized actuators; because these two mystiques are part of the general mood or ambiance of individuals involved in gaming activities... and is easily observable when children or adults are engaged in playing a game... as if they are isolated for a time, in a make-shift atmospheric bubble at a distance from the larger reality and acts like a type of sports referenced "zone" being sold and bought as a highly prized possession— even though variously named or simply perceived varieties occur in artistic, music, writing, mathematics, science, religion, business and other crafts... through sometimes subtly intuited from a skewed peripheral acknowledgment denoted as "something or someone is there... at the tip of one's tongue, fingertips, or edge of discernible consciousness".
In other words, we acknowledge that the currency of one person's thought may be the metaphysics of another's, and that they would feel starkly enlightened to have the rather vacuousness of their ideation grounded into discernible language that is metaphorically portrayed by the illustration of someone reaching a long sought for summit of a perspicacious conscious awareness. In economic terms they want to know what the currency of their new found consciousness of wealth will be able to purchase, after trying to unravel what type of economy is best to use as a method of exchange without a government protected business philosophy of "caveat emptor" (without a warranty, let the buyer beware), from a practice of privatization which personalize exploitations that force those who have been taken advantage of to seek solace in those idealizations using various tinctures of delusion or illusion which some refer to as inebriation, insobriety, drunkenness or prefer the Marx (-attributed) phrase "opiate of the masses", though it is said he restricted his view of a social narcosis to that of religion.
Social philosophies which espouse to apply mechanized effects resulting from human related behavior with the propriety of being just as much an individual as a person is (such as the notion of Corporate "Personhood"), are modernized forms of exercising a primitive practice of anthropomorphism (attributing animate qualities to inanimate objects)... and is representative of a recurring inclination amongst those with a predominant focus on self-orientation in an otherwise overwhelming social landscape; to indulge in the usage of a multi-faceted, two-patterned conservatism. The Anarchism insistence on decentralized governments and preferred local autonomies (masquerading as centralized leadership in smaller social units to better effect tribal or clan types of administrative control); and the Libertarian emphasis of an unrestricted market coupled to a social atmosphere of individualized liberty— unrestrained by government interference, and is subject only to the law(s) of a presumed "force" of inherently born natural order... are advanced by those advocates who appreciably lack any experience living in a "free for all" social situation where restrictions are subject to the will of the strong, be it a strength of muscle, money, machination, mischief/monkey business or madness.
All economic policies revolve around three generalized issues stemming from three types of economic systems labeled Command, Market, Traditional... with the "Traditional" economy selection referring to inter-generational control determined by birth such as in a Monarchy/Aristocracy, but has been substituted, because of the wide-spread decline of such a tradition (in the traditional, but not modern variation); with the label "Mixed Economy"... as if there is an underlying psychic need to introduce another third item instead of leaving the older three-pronged listing vacant of one item. However, such simplistic renderings as those which follow, can become increasingly complicated by those advancing individual, regional, or national interests as opposed to global concerns for the overall well-being of humanity:
With respect to social theories focused on governing, it is of need to point out that references such as Anarchism, Communism, Democracy, Libertarianism, Socialism, etc., are theories of management... of managerial style, that typically are micro-managed by open, closed, planned or a presumed underlying exercise of modulation thought to underlie all social groups whose structure of control takes place on subtle instead of overt social mechanisms of bureaucracy; whose very definition is subjected to a bureaucracy of interpretation, application and referencing.
When they look for leadership they see various equivocations coming from the forested quagmires of Anarchist doctrine, the deserted oasis of Communist futuristic provincialism, the illusions of Democratic distortions of reality, the libations of Libertarianism, the solicitations of Socialism's sashaying soliloquies, and let us not forget Religion's resourceful reflections of retarded resplendencies, or economic's theories embraced as ecumenical necessities supporting specialized interests which take advantage of the majority so that a few might prosper egregiously so— and thus interpreted as a presumed divination of manifest destiny to cure all social ills, but ingratiates itself amongst world leaderships like a symbiotic cancer that eats away at the soul of humanity like so many maggot and rat-filled entrepreneurial-ships launched by social ceremonies that disrespect an indentured workforce whose brow is used as the bow upon which is broken a bottle of vintage wine from the vineyards of the government protected wealthy who are perpetually drunk on their own obsessiveness to deprive others any form of equanimity unless they can profit from it.
When a given people do think in terms of extended expanses of time, it often is with regard to familial interests, though some leaders view it within the scope of a religious belief, a nation or an empire; and not the species... which very often is reflected on in various models of disparagement, because humanity does not think very much of humanity. Humanity as a species is belittled, ambushed, tortured, raped and murdered... but it is not seen as a fledgling creature capable of great deeds and multiple potentialities if encouraged and supported in such a direction. Unfortunately, its role models are philosophies that live in various worlds of proposed make-believe with serendipitous characters of hope as its guide that engage in near-sighted eccentricities like Don Quixote. For the most part, humanity lives without a global philosophy not tied to some plasticized religious edifice whose value is as wanting as the future of the Earth itself. Humanity lives without a global purpose, without a leader who can unite all nationalities to pursue a singular goal... a leader that can incorporate all individual interests towards a singular purpose because such an effort will advantage everyone as a permanent value as precious as life itself.
For example, the following three images illustrates the idea quite succinctly:
Needless to say, there are many social issues which need to be confronted but we feel can only be adequately addressed by establishing a New Government... a Cenocracy.
Date of Origination: Thursday, 29-Dec-2016... 01:44 AM
Date of Initial Posting: Thursday, 29-Dec-2016... 10:35 AM
Updated Posting: Wednesday, 18-Jan-2017... 10:28 AM