- Home
- Contents
- Let's Talk Seriously About Peace
- Cenocratic Manifesto Pages List
- Predictable Despotic Governments
- Public Exam Center
- 1st Stop Voting
- State Of War
- Status Quo Routines
- Guild Organized Governments
- Welcome To America 1
- Welcome To America 2
- Americas Political Guild System
- American Peasant Citizenry
- Super-Sanity and Cenocracy
- Protest Options

page 50

Note: the contents of this page as well as those which precede and follow, must be read as a continuation and/or overlap in order that the continuity about a relationship to/with the dichotomous arrangement of the idea that one could possibly talk seriously about peace from a different perspective as well as the typical dichotomous assignment of Artificial Intelligence (such as the usage of zeros and ones used in computer programming) ... will not be lost (such as war being frequently used to describe an absence of peace and vice-versa). However, if your mind is prone to being distracted by timed or untimed commercialization (such as that seen in various types of American-based television, radio, news media and magazine publishing... not to mention the average classroom which carries over into the everyday workplace), you may be unable to sustain prolonged exposures to divergent ideas about a singular topic without becoming confused, unless the information is provided in a very simplistic manner.

Let's face it, humanity has a lousy definition, accompanying practice, and analysis of peace.

The present era of humanity is a very stupid period in which to live. Whereas we have individuals and individualized populations that are evolving a higher consciousness, many others appear to be regressing. And this regression is compounded by the situation in which leading institutions are being managed by those whose perceptions are part of a stagnation, if not the regression. Imaginatively it is like a modern human having to adopt the bestial skills exhibited by an a group of less evolved humans who think their world-view is the manifest truth like many a religious follower does. Because it is easier for a more intelligent person to adopt bestial actions and thinking than it is for a bestial form of human to adopt intelligent thoughts and actions, survival may sometimes require intelligent people to mimic the same stupidity... or to do as the Romans do... so to speak.

Hence, the topics of peace and war become accepted as the practiced given though alternative perceptions such as those having been offered in the present series of essays may come to be appreciably understood by those whose underlying consciousness in future-bound. Those whose brains are geared more for a stagnation or regression will have difficulty even in getting the slightest sense of what is being conveyed. For example, when bringing the topic of symmetry into the foray of discussion, the only "mirror-image" they can comprehend is a "selfie" image like a chimpanzee coming to recognize their own image in a mirror... or as an animal who thinks their own image to be a curiosity or threat. The topics of war and peace are likewise images that one another may come to associate some aspect of their own identity with, though as is most commonly to be noted, few people ever look into a mirror and wonder whether they are viewed in terms of that to be identified with, or as a curiosity, or as a threat. While some try to create an image of themselves that is welcomed by others, there are those whose self-consciousness interprets their reflection as an oddity, as something strange, unusual, crazy, wrong or even bizarre... from which different types of neuroticisms and pathologies may needlessly be born from. However, there are those who go out of their way to try and establish a reflection to be highly respected or rejected due to fear. Similarly, the topics and practices of peace are various gradations of such image definitions. In other words, while some seek to reflect peace, others fear it because they have a lifestyle which is based in part on conflict that they may alternatively describe as competition.

No less, there are those who want to reflect the image of a war character from which they are enabled to acquire respect from those who respect the display of such an image... even if a large population views them to be little more than legalized murderers and social disrupters. It is a perspective deserving of its own paragraph so that peace and war... though symmetrically place, are not permitted to have their own identities even while they are paired in much the same manner as values of charge when symmetry and pairing are discussed in particle physics. So long as one is viewing the topic with an application to the present discussion translated in terms of metaphor and generality as a means of alternative intellectual exploration for identifying alternative structural modeling for the purposes of enhancing an understanding that remains stalemated by surrendering oneself to conventions embodied in traditional perspectives allied to the ideas of peace (and war), a similitude of proportioned relevance can be established... if not but on the landscape of as yet unapplied philosophical considerations.

__From the Merriam-Webster dictionary (Symmetry)__

- Balanced proportions ; also: beauty of form arising from balanced proportions.
- The property of being symmetrical ; esp: correspondence in size, shape, and relative position of parts on opposite sides of a dividing line or median plane or about a center or axis compare bilateral symmetry radial symmetry.
- A rigid motion of a geometric figure that determines a one-to-one mapping onto itself.
- The property of remaining invariant under certain changes (as of orientation in space, of the sign of the electric charge, of parity, or of the direction of time flow) — used of physical phenomena and of equations describing them.

__From the Wordweb dictionary: (Symmetry)__

- (Mathematics) an attribute of a shape or relation; exact reflection of form on opposite sides of a dividing line or plane.
- Balance among the parts of something.
- (Physics) the property of being isotropic; having the same value when measured in different directions.

- In Brain Hemispheres: Let's Talk Peace page 11
- In Physics: Let's Talk Peace page 12
- In Biology and Crystallography: Let's Talk Peace page 13
- In Early Organisms: Let's Talk Peace page 30
- As an expression denoted as parity: Let's Talk Peace page 48
The normal behaviour of a gas on cooling is to condense into a liquid and then into a solid, though the liquid phase may be left out if the gas starts at a low enough pressure. The solid phase of a pure substance is usually crystalline, having the atoms or molecules arranged in a regular pattern so that a suitable small sample may define the whole. The unit cell is the smallest block out of which the pattern can be formed by stacking replicas. The checkerboard in Figure 12 illustrates the idea; here the unit cell has been chosen out of many possibilities to contain one white square and one black, dissected into quarters. For crystals, of course, the unit cell is three-dimensional. A very wide variety of arrangements is exhibited by different substances, and it is the great triumph of X-ray crystallography to have provided the means for determining experimentally what arrangement is involved in each case. One may ask whether mathematical techniques exist for deducing the correct result independently of experiment, and the answer is almost always no. An individual sulfur atom, for example, has no features that reflect its preference, in the company of others, for forming rings of eight. This characteristic can only be discovered theoretically by calculating the total energy of different-sized rings and of other patterns and determining after much computation that the ring of eight has the lowest energy of all. Even then the investigator has no assurance that there is no other arrangement which confers still lower energy. In one of the forms taken by solid sulfur, the unit cell contains 128 atoms in a complex of rings. It would be an inspired guess to hit on this fact without the aid of X-rays or the expertise of chemists, and mathematics provides no systematic procedure as an alternative to guessing or relying on experiment. Nevertheless, it may be possible in simpler cases to show that calculations of the energy are in accord with the observed crystal forms. Thus, when silicon is strongly compressed, it passes through a succession of different crystal modifications for each of which the variation with pressure of the energy can be calculated. The pressure at which a given change of crystal form takes place is that at which the energy takes the same value for both modifications involved. As this pressure is reached, one gives way to the other for the possession of the lower energy. The fact that the calculation correctly describes not only the order in which the different forms occur but also the pressures at which the change-overs take place indicates that the physical theory is in good shape; only the power is lacking in the mathematics to predict behaviour from first principles. The changes in symmetry that occur at the critical points where one modification changes to another are complex examples of a widespread phenomenon for which simple analogues exist. A perfectly straight metal strip, firmly fixed to a base so that it stands perfectly upright, remains straight as an increasing load is placed on its upper end until a critical load is reached. Any further load causes the strip to heel over and assume a bent form, and it only takes a minute disturbance to determine whether it will bend to the left or to the right. The fact that either outcome is equally likely reflects the left–right symmetry of the arrangement, but once the choice is made the symmetry is broken. The subsequent response to changing load and the small vibrations executed when the strip is struck lightly are characteristic of the new unsymmetrical shape. If one wishes to calculate the behaviour, it is essential to avoid assuming that an arrangement will always remain symmetrical simply because it was initially so. In general, as with the condensation of sulfur atoms or with the crystalline transitions in silicon, the symmetry implicit in the formulation of the theory will be maintained only in the totality of possible solutions, not necessarily in the particular solution that appears in practice. In the case of the condensation of a crystal from individual atoms, the spherical symmetry of each atom tells one no more than that the crystal may be formed equally well with its axis pointing in any direction; and such information provides no help in finding the crystal structure. In general, there is no substitute for experiment. Even with relatively simple systems such as engineering structures, it is all too easy to overlook the possibility of symmetry breaking, leading to calamitous failure. It should not be assumed that the critical behaviour of a loaded strip depends on its being perfectly straight. If the strip is not, it is likely to prefer one direction of bending to the other. As the load is increased, so will the intrinsic bend be exaggerated, and there will be no critical point at which a sudden change occurs. By tilting the base, however, it is possible to compensate for the initial imperfection and to find once more a position where left and right are equally favoured. Then the critical behaviour is restored, and at a certain load the necessity of choice is present as with a perfect strip. The study of this and numerous more complex examples is the province of the so-called catastrophe theory. A catastrophe, in the special sense used here, is a situation in which a continuously varying input to a system gives rise to a discontinuous change in the response at a critical point. The discontinuities may take many forms, and their character may be sensitive in different ways to small changes in the parameters of the system. Catastrophe theory is the term used to describe the systematic classification, by means of topological mathematics, of these discontinuities. Wide-ranging though the theory may be, it cannot at present include in its scope most of the symmetry-breaking transitions undergone by crystals.
As is explained in detail in the article thermodynamics, the laws of thermodynamics make possible the characterization of a given sample of matter—after it has settled down to equilibrium with all parts at the same temperature—by ascribing numerical measures to a small number of properties (pressure, volume, energy, and so forth). One of these is entropy. As the temperature of the body is raised by adding heat, its entropy as well as its energy is increased. On the other hand, when a volume of gas enclosed in an insulated cylinder is compressed by pushing on the piston, the energy in the gas increases while the entropy stays the same or, usually, increases a little. In atomic terms, the total energy is the sum of all the kinetic and potential energies of the atoms, and the entropy, it is commonly asserted, is a measure of the disorderly state of the constituent atoms. The heating of a crystalline solid until it melts and then vaporizes is a progress from a well-ordered, low-entropy state to a disordered, high-entropy state. The principal deduction from the second law of thermodynamics (or, as some prefer, the actual statement of the law) is that, when an isolated system makes a transition from one state to another, its entropy can never decrease. If a beaker of water with a lump of sodium on a shelf above it is sealed in a thermally insulated container and the sodium is then shaken off the shelf, the system, after a period of great agitation, subsides to a new state in which the beaker contains hot sodium hydroxide solution. The entropy of the resulting state is higher than the initial state, as can be demonstrated quantitatively by suitable measurements. The idea that a system cannot spontaneously become better ordered but can readily become more disordered, even if left to itself, appeals to one's experience of domestic economy and confers plausibility on the law of increase of entropy. As far as it goes, there is much truth in this naive view of things, but it cannot be pursued beyond this point without a much more precise definition of disorder. Thermodynamic entropy is a numerical measure that can be assigned to a given body by experiment; unless disorder can be defined with equal precision, the relation between the two remains too vague to serve as a basis for deduction. A precise definition is to be found by considering the number, labeled W, of different arrangements that can be taken up by a given collection of atoms, subject to their total energy being fixed. In quantum mechanics, W is the number of different quantum states that are available to the atoms with this total energy (strictly, in a very narrow range of energies). It is so vast for objects of everyday size as to be beyond visualization; for the helium atoms contained in one cubic centimetre of gas at atmospheric pressure and at 0°C the number of different quantum states can be written as 1 followed by 170 million million million zeroes (written out, the zeroes would fill nearly one trillion sets of the Encyclopædia Britannica). The science of statistical mechanics, as founded by Ludwig Boltzmann and J. Willard Gibbs, relates the behaviour of a multitude of atoms to the
thermal properties of the material they constitute. Boltzmann and Gibbs, along with Max Planck, established that the entropy, S, as derived through
the second law of thermodynamics, is related to W by the formula S = k ln W, where k is the Boltzmann constant (1.3806488 x 10 When a gas is thermally isolated and slowly compressed, the individual quantum states change their character and become mixed together, but the total number W does not alter. In this change, called adiabatic, entropy remains constant. On the other hand, if a vessel is divided by a partition, one side of which is filled with gas while the other side is evacuated, piercing the partition to allow the gas to spread throughout the vessel greatly increases the number of states available so that W and the entropy rise. The act of piercing requires little effort and may even happen spontaneously through corrosion. To reverse the process, waiting for the gas to accumulate accidentally on one side and then stopping the leak, would mean waiting for a time compared with which the age of the universe would be imperceptibly short. The chance of finding an observable decrease in entropy for an isolated system can be ruled out. This does not mean that a part of a system may not decrease in entropy at the expense of at least as great an increase in the rest of the system. Such processes are indeed commonplace but only when the system as a whole is not in thermal equilibrium. Whenever the atmosphere becomes supersaturated with water and condenses into a cloud, the entropy per molecule of water in the droplets is less than it was prior to condensation. The remaining atmosphere is slightly warmed and has a higher entropy. The spontaneous appearance of order is especially obvious when the water vapour condenses into snow crystals. A domestic refrigerator lowers the entropy of its contents while increasing that of its surroundings. Most important of all, the state of non-equilibrium of the Earth irradiated by the much hotter Sun provides an environment in which the cells of plants and animals may build order—i.e., lower their local entropy at the expense of their environment. The Sun provides a motive power that is analogous (though much more complex in detailed operation) to the electric cable connected to the refrigerator. There is no evidence pointing to any ability on the part of living matter to run counter to the principle of increasing (overall) disorder as formulated in the second law of thermodynamics. The irreversible tendency toward disorder provides a sense of direction for time which is absent from space. One may traverse a path between two
points in space without feeling that the reverse journey is forbidden by physical laws. The same is not true for time travel, and yet the equations of
motion, whether in Newtonian or quantum mechanics, have no such built-in irreversibility. A motion picture of a large number of particles interacting
with one another looks equally plausible whether run forward or backward. To illustrate and resolve this paradox it is convenient to return to the
example of a gas enclosed in a vessel divided by a pierced partition. This time, however, only 100 atoms are involved (not 3 x 10 If one were to follow the fluctuations for a very long time and single out those rare occasions when a particular number occurred that was considerably greater than 50, say 75, one would find that the next number is more likely to be 74 than 76. Such would be the case because, if there are 75 atoms on one side of the partition, there will be only 25 on the other, and it is three times more likely that one atom will leave the 75 than that one will be gained from the 25. Also, since the detailed motions are reversible, it is three times more likely that the 75 was preceded by a 74 rather than by a 76. In other words, if one finds the system in a state that is far from the mean, it is highly probable that the system has just managed to get there and is on the point of falling back. If the system has momentarily fluctuated into a state of lower entropy, the entropy will be found to increase again immediately. It might be thought that this argument has already conceded the possibility of entropy decreasing. It has indeed, but only for a system on the
minute scale of 100 atoms. The same computation carried out for 3 x 10 t is possible, however, that in the course of time the universe will suffer "heat death," having attained a condition of maximum entropy, after which tiny fluctuations are all that will happen. If so, these will be reversible, like the graph of Figure 13, and will give no indication of a direction of time. Yet, because this undifferentiated cosmic soup will be devoid of structures necessary for consciousness, the sense of time will in any case have vanished long since.
Many systems can be described in terms of a small number of parameters and behave in a highly predictable manner. Were this not the case, the laws of physics might never have been elucidated. If one maintains the swing of a pendulum by tapping it at regular intervals, say once per swing, it will eventually settle down to a regular oscillation. Now let it be jolted out of its regularity; in due course it will revert to its previous oscillation as if nothing had disturbed it. Systems that respond in this well-behaved manner have been studied extensively and have frequently been taken to define the norm, from which departures are somewhat unusual. It is with such departures that this section is concerned. An example not unlike the periodically struck pendulum is provided by a ball bouncing repeatedly in a vertical line on a base plate that is caused to vibrate up and down to counteract dissipation and maintain the bounce. With a small but sufficient amplitude of base motion the ball synchronizes with the plate, returning regularly once per cycle of vibration. With larger amplitudes the ball bounces higher but still manages to remain synchronized until eventually this becomes impossible. Two alternatives may then occur: (1) the ball may switch to a new synchronized mode in which it bounces so much higher that it returns only every two, three, or more cycles, or (2) it may become unsynchronized and return at irregular, apparently random, intervals. Yet, the behaviour is not random in the way that raindrops strike a small area of surface at irregular intervals. The arrival of a raindrop allows one to make no prediction of when the next will arrive; the best one can hope for is a statement that there is half a chance that the next will arrive before the lapse of a certain time. By contrast, the bouncing ball is described by a rather simple set of differential equations that can be solved to predict without fail when the next bounce will occur and how fast the ball will be moving on impact, given the time of the last bounce and the speed of that impact. In other words, the system is precisely determinate, yet to the casual observer it is devoid of regularity. Systems that are determinate but irregular in this sense are called chaotic; like so many other scientific terms, this is a technical expression that bears no necessary relation to the word's common usage. The coexistence of irregularity with strict determinism can be illustrated by an arithmetic example, one that lay behind some of the more fruitful
early work in the study of chaos, particularly by the physicist Mitchell J. Feigenbaum following an inspiring exposition by Robert M. May. Suppose
one constructs a sequence of numbers starting with an arbitrarily chosen x When A lies between 2 and 3, it also settles to a constant but takes longer to do so. It is when A is increased above 3 that the sequence shows more unexpected features. At first, until A reaches 3.42, the final pattern is an alternation of two numbers, but with further small increments of A it changes to a cycle of 4, followed by 8, 16, and so forth at ever-closer intervals of A. By the time A reaches 3.57, the length of the cycle has grown beyond bounds—it shows no periodicity however long one continues the sequence. This is the most elementary example of chaos, but it is easy to construct other formulas for generating number sequences that can be studied rapidly with the aid of the smallest programmable computer. By such "experimental arithmetic" Feigenbaum found that the transition from regular convergence through cycles of 2, 4, 8, and so forth to chaotic sequences followed strikingly similar courses for all, and he gave an explanation that involved great subtlety of argument and was almost rigorous enough for pure mathematicians. The chaotic sequence shares with the chaotic bouncing of the ball in the earlier example the property of limited predictability, as distinct from
the strong predictability of the periodically driven pendulum and of the regular sequence found when A is less than 3. Just as the pendulum, having
been disturbed, eventually settles back to its original routine, so the regular sequence, for a given choice of A, settles to the same final number
whatever initial value x Linear systems for which the response to a force is strictly proportional to the magnitude of the force do not show chaotic behaviour. The pendulum, if not too far from the vertical, is a linear system, as are electrical circuits containing resistors that obey Ohm's law or capacitors and inductors for which voltage and current also are proportional. The analysis of linear systems is a well-established technique that plays an important part in the education of a physicist. It is relatively easy to teach, since the range of behaviour exhibited is small and can be encapsulated in a few general rules. Nonlinear systems, on the other hand, are bewilderingly versatile in their modes of behaviour and are, moreover, very commonly unamenable to elegant mathematical analysis. Until large computers became readily available, the natural history of nonlinear systems was little explored and the extraordinary prevalence of chaos unappreciated. To a considerable degree physicists have been persuaded, in their innocence, that predictability is a characteristic of a well-established theoretical structure; given the equations defining a system, it is only a matter of computation to determine how it will behave. However, once it becomes clear how many systems are sufficiently nonlinear to be considered for chaos, it has to be recognized that prediction may be limited to short stretches set by the horizon of predictability. Full comprehension is not to be achieved by establishing firm fundamentals, important though they are, but must frequently remain a tentative process, a step at a time, with frequent recourse to experiment and observation in the event that prediction and reality have diverged too far. Sir A. Brian Pippard; Emeritus Professor of Physics, University of Cambridge; Cavendish Professor, 1971–82. Author of Elements of Classical
Thermodynamics and others.Source: "Physical Science, Principles of." Encyclopædia Britannica Ultimate Reference Suite, 2013. |

Indeed, many of us believe that we are living in an epoch where many different types of reality have emerged due to the often unacknowledged differences in perceptions and practices amongst individuals and institutions where a relative equilibrium is experiencing fluctuations which may become more radical under given circumstances... and eventually set into motion a wave of activity that can only be stopped by burning itself out... long after millions, if not billions of lives are unduly affected in negative ways, though a few may well prosper and want to maintain their wealth (power) by keeping the conditions alive.