Many of us feel that a political Revolution is inevitable in their Respective Nation. And while many of us would prefer that the Revolution be carried out in a Diplomatic way, we are not certain that a Non-violent Revolution can take place. Because governments typically adopt laws which prevent their publics from initiating the process by which the mood for carrying out a Revolution takes hold in the public consciousness... from which actionable events take place; the public must therefore either defer their desire for governing change through legislative and legal processes that are viewed as inept and reeking of inequality, or they must go against those laws which are viewed as being against the people... and the need of the public instigating changes which they deem are necessary.
When the public has no real voice, and are subjected to variations of pathetic forms of surrogate Representation, they are left with no recourse but to consider involving themselves in a Revolution. We therefore earnestly entreat leaderships from all venues to please provide us with a viable alternative other than that which wants us to wait for and waste more time that are indulged in allusions, excuses, and illusions instead of actual development towards a measurable public goal. We need you to come forward because we neither trust nor can depend on Journalists as an impartial mediator, because time and again many of them have shown themselves to be disgusting and degenerate tyrants to the actual Will of the Public...and must be culled, one way or another, from being able to participate in the upcoming Revolutionary dialogue.
It is not that government can not nor does not provide good benefits. It's that it uses such offerings as a means of concealing undesirable acts and excusing itself from having to be accountable for the developmental minimization of further public control of a government that right belongs to the people themselves, or they are faced with the reality that democracy is woefully non-existent. It is an ownership that the people must take full responsibility of and not use present government processes as if it were a landlord able to effect whatever policies it wants on the public who are treated as negligible occupants and absentee owners. Yet, when speaking of the need for a Revolution, it is because the true owners effected the experience of being a prince who masqueraded as a pauper, and was able to see how the common person is being mis-treated in many respects. Where the government can be a Dr. Jekyll who is kind, considerate, patient, generous, helpful and exhibit many virtuous qualities, it also shows itself to be a Mr. Hyde. In the government's explorations and experimentations of growth without being tempered by the public's over-sight and ability to control its excesses; it privately commits atrocities that have more and more frequently come to be shown in its public persona... and thus used as a role model that others in different occupations begin to practice as an acceptable character trait— which the government then uses to excuse itself for indulging in more undesirable acts that are mimicked by others... in a see -and- saw type of adopted aberrant civility.
There are numerous changes which must take place in the current practices of government. For example, let us provide a short list of changes that some in the public in the United States deem are valid issues that are going unaddressed. The present list is not based on any such "most urgent" criteria or any special order, except for that which come to mind at the moment of writing amidst a neighborhood of barking dogs, crowing roosters, a brayful mule, and the tell-tale signs of a lisping dawn:
The above list is but a significantly small handful of the many, many, many issues needing to be addressed. Yet, the present government structure is inadequate to the task, and promotes a legislative environment whose mentality is counter-productive to the evolutionary growth of the public. Because the call for a Revolution is increasing, we must ask ourselves if a non-violent model of Revolution is at all possible, because there are so many who do not want the public to collectively improve its standard of equality, justice and liberty. There are so many who are against the establishment of a fully functioning Democracy, and that there are so many who are deluded into thinking the government is a practicing Democracy though it is not; we must ask if the usage of violence and destruction are an inevitability.
Must we Revolutionists engage in a simultaneously concerted and wide-spread attack against thousands of leaders in different sectors of Business, Government and Religion, or can an evolutionary type of development take place by way of conventional methodologies? Though death and destruction are abhorrent idealisms, we are nonetheless faced with the question of whether or not decisive growth of the public's ability to collectively govern itself by its own volition, without a surrogate Representative, is a possibility. Again and again, because we are being confronted by those in the business, government and religious communities who live by a code of conduct that is not conducive to the growth of the public's ability to engage in a collective form of equality in terms of self-governance; we come to the precipice of directing our attentions towards efforts for engaging in an inevitable confrontation that is leading us all along a path of establishing a greater level of public rights through acts of death and destruction.
However, our message to the public and all forms of authority must be made clear. If they have a viable alternative as to how the public's rights can be increased, then we will gladly listen. Our desire is not for the execution of death creating and destructive acts. We much prefer diplomatic resolutions. But we will have the changes which are needed and desired. Any interference will be deemed a treasonous act against the public and subject to the most vicious retribution we can muster at any given moment. Our Cause is just, though crude it may presently appear to some. It will evolve and be made known to all in all walks of life. We intend to achieve our goals... because they are goals desperately needed by the public in order to effectively be in charge of their own government. And so we ask once again, is a non-violent Revolution possible, given all that you know about the historical evidence accumulated with respect to the self-centered interests of Business, Government and Religious leaderships? Are present leaderships any different than their past models, with respect to the intentional or unacknowledged "prevailing business environment" collusions they engage in against the public?