While the Cenocratic Revolution does in fact publicly announce a preferential predisposition towards non-violent approaches to exercise its right to protest, to assemble, and to have grievances addresses to the satisfaction of the people; we must also give evidence for insisting upon the usage of a cogent wisdom by all observers. Please do not misunderstand our pacifism.
The "Cenocratic Revolution" (Movement) does not underscore or "bottom line" its efforts with an inclination towards simplistic or superficially intoned utterances as expressed by song-spoken phrase entitled "Give peace a chance"; because it is nothing more than a social group pacifier that does not produce actual results of solving social problems that can be solved through social self-governing reform.
The phrase "Give Peace a Chance" is easily seen as a security blanket, talking stuffed animal, or Jack-in-the-box musical distraction for those unable or unwilling to think beyond the confines of their reserved compliance to circumstances they react to as does a child in a baby crib... by whining, crying (often with out-stretched arms or hands wanting assistance), rocking to and fro, being mesmerized by an authoritatively-placed mobile, or sucking on/playing with some form of a commercially placed pacifier. It's time for the public to grow up and be weaned from the present forms of Communistic, Democratic and Socialistic bottles. The weaning and subsequent teething are about to begin.
Indeed, the word "peace" typically is defined as an absence of war, yet is rarely or ever defined as an absence of:
And a word needs to be said about those countries which have a Volunteer Military. It must be realized that if there were enough well paying jobs in the civilian sector, military recruiting quotas would not be met. The youth who voluntarily go into the military do so in an effort to secure some semblance of steady pay with medical benefits. If an economy is doing well, the volunteer rates of those going into the military drop off. It is necessary for the government not to ensure that there are enough jobs for the young in order that its military will be well-stocked. A country with a military dependent on voluntary enlistment must make the circumstances of the military look promising. This is more easily accomplished if jobs are not available anywhere else. If people were going into the service primarily as a patriotic gesture "to serve their country", then the military would not have to discuss rate of pay, housing, medical, and other benefits.
"Give Peace a Chance" is the theme song of pacifists who are like slaves quietly accepting the fate of "servitude without indentured beatings", or like sheep who obligingly bleat in a form of patriotic cadence while circulating as cattle do in a contrived shoot of social encirclement as they make their way towards a "compassionate, respectful and humane" means of slaughtering them... as if their only birthright is to be a classless classification that could be labeled a 'specific usage' (instead of "collateral damage") due to a proximity with a given human population. The distortions of human thinking that is perpetrated and perpetuated by the various forms of Communism, Democracy and Socialism are so multi-faceted that recurring social problems are not solved because those who are in a position to solve them have a mindset that can't recognize what the actual roots of the problems are.
We are well aware that Legislative Representatives with integrity, honesty, and sensitivity duly want to do the best they can for the Nation and the people; with no intent of making the people an after-thought as might be suggested in the trailing placement of their regard in a phrase of an expressed thought. We would like to believe that most, if not all of them have a far reaching altruism. However, we must also note that no matter their individual and collective talents, giftedness or genius, the system in which they are forced to work has insurmountable obstacles in place due to the structural formula being used by the current government. It is therefore up to us, in as much as we are able, to convince them that Cenocracy affords them with a greater means of helping the people and the nation achieve its greatest potentialities. While there is no guarantee we will be successful in our endeavours to this end, we our hopeful that if we can convince them that Cenocracy is the better social self-governing system and the people support it, Cenocracy will ultimately be adopted.
And yet, it is not well contemplated the extent to which the people, individually as well as collectively, represent a wide ranging and deep potential which routine thinking; brought about the current forms of social self-governance, forces us... as a nation, into a level of self-defeating mediocrity of same-mindedness and that the only expressions of independent thinking arise in the extremities of human social participation generally referred to as recognized or unrecognized professionalism and criminality. Such expressions can be likened to nerve-ending twitches of an organism confined to an examination table where routinized procedures of Standard Operating Practices want everyone to record the same observations and differences are to be labeled as irrelevant anomalies instead of characterizations of an underlying representation that something quite unique may exist.
In other words, the very things we are presently calling talent, giftedness, genius (and wonder why criminals can't use their "talents and energies" in socially useful and constructive ways) can be singularly defined as a social phenomenon of the physics modality called Relativity. Simply stated, they are labels describing different perceptions of the same vaguely defined "tip of an iceberg" with respect to human potentiality which can be unlocked if given the appropriate atmosphere of cultivation. Such a soil of nutrients is to be found in the adoption of a Cenocracy. The citizenry must not only be permitted, but be encouraged to develop new paradigms of thought and action and not let the current "authoritative" edicts in science, art, music, fashion, literature, politics, education, etc.; fuse everyone's brain into a conveyor belt mentality of political correctness.
Those who seek to reject the Cenocratic Revolution are those fearful of having their actual so-called "uniqueness" seen as a mediocrity if they should lose the present "authoritative" position diminished by the social changes following the adoption of a Cenocracy. The illusion of their presumed uniqueness would dissipate because prevailing auras of mystique related to their positions would be recognized for what they actually are: socially accepted authoritative formulas modeled on antiquated repositories of various superstitions concealed with modern garments, modern language, and specialized vernaculars all meant to induce a receptivity to manipulation which act as supplements to the increasing instances of "celebrating mediocrity" being fostered by present "dumbing down the populace" Communisms, Democracies and Socialisms which practice a guiding patriotism based on sameness of mind to enhance gullibility... a stultifying sameness which is pervasive in medical treatment, education, workplaces, etc... like ants in a colony who have no other role to play but to play a role of sameness... or like symbiotic creatures whose whole purpose is to assist with the perpetuation of the host, no matter how useless the host is in a larger grasp of reality.
It is a reality forestalled by present social governing processes which have self-asserting protective mechanisms written into a social code of conduct; that are reinforced by routines of mind fostered by routine perceptions in a stagnant, or very slowly changing governing a landscape as might a foundation though the visible structure may take on era-specific conventionalisms? Such a state of affairs entices us to ask how we go about changing the routines of such minds without dramatically altering the landscape such as through destruction? If not the visible landscape, than the landscape of collective interpretation or the underlying foundations without using fear, intimidation, threat, violence, etc.? Is the promise of a potential reward enough and must it be immediate or can it be delayed? Such questions are issues considered by a humanitarian-based reflective conscientiousness.
While some rhetoric used by a few Cenocrats will undoubtedly be expressions of bravado and chest-thumping, as is the case when a multiplicity of voices begin to speak with their own individuality of a subject in profile, they must realistically be viewed as an accented genre of literature. Similar "literary" expressions can be heard at sporting events such as the "kill the umpire!" remark heard at certain baseball games when one or more fans "warmly" disagree with an umpire's call. Clearly, the "authoritative" umpire is in no actual danger of being killed... at least not by any rational fan.
But, let us also make note of the fact that some fans (men or women) have what may be referred to as a "borderline rationality". They are those who seek out an event in which underlying anti-social inclinations can be expressed in a context which disguises their neurotic or psychotic impulses that are directed towards destruction of life and/or or property. These are those who attach themselves to one or another group or organization with the intent of vigilantly awaiting a time and place to effect an act of self-seeking opportunism without regard for another's life or property. Such people are not Cenocrats.
The Cenocratic Revolution is the acknowledgment of those, from different walks of life, calling themselves Cenocrats, who prefer to carry walking sticks or other items they consider might be necessary as they travel towards an uncharted territory named Cenocracy. Cenocracy is not a singular moment in time and place to effect an instance of selfish opportunism even though some will try to use it as such under presumed provisions of current law. An example of this is those taking every economic advantage they can during the conditions of a war, pestilence, riot, natural disaster, or whatever situation they can wrestle another dollar out of. Such people wash their hands of all blame and guilt... and will simply ask for some charitable forgiveness if it is found that something they did or did not do which contributed to the exasperations of the event in one way or another.
While such a "Revolutionary" (Cenocratic) exploration might be said to be in some ways practiced by that which is called Direct Democracy as is seen in Switzerland, it has never been tried before with so many people from disparate walks of life who are coming together because they all share the same calling for this unique, once-in-a-life-time adventure.
|Switzerland's long-held status of being a neutral country impresses a conservatism on the typical results and process of the peoples Referendum. However, America and many other countries do not practice a "hands off" approach towards wanting to express a global responsibility. Therefore, "Direct Democracy" as practiced by Switzerland will be considerably different from the Cenocracy practiced by Americans, Brits, Vietnamese, Chinese, Spanish, Russians, French, Portuguese, Bolivians, Danes, Germans, Slavs, Poles, Chilians, Hungarians, Fins, Japanese, Mexicans, Czechs, Filipinos, Italians, Canadians, Koreans, Africans, Australians, Argentinians, and others.|
For some, Cenocracy is likened to the first-hand exploration of a new island, or a new continent, or a new planet. For others, the exploration of an unknown is a very fearful and forbidden thing. They might well claim there are too many possible pitfalls, quicksands and quagmires and that the majority of the public does not have the needed intelligence, resilience or fortitude for such an undertaking that is best left to so-called professionals. They might serve to render accusations as an attempt to conjure the very demons used by those of past generations who claimed the same for the usage of those beliefs which they view as unassailable commodities of a greater consciousness; be it called Communism, Democracy, Socialism or other doctrine of social ordering. Their fears may even suggest that a departure from the practice of their perceived truth might well lead to the reversion of some earlier primitive social governing process.
Those against the journey into the realm of Cenocracy suggest that, instead, we adopt a variation of the Cenocratic model by establishing a selection of committees made up of the citizenry that will simply make suggestions to the existing Executive, Judicial and Legislative bodies. But the usage of such committees is not even a close approximation to an equitable compromise. It would be little more than a subjugation of the Cenocratic identity to a mirage created in the desolate landscape of a wasteland with water-holes controlled by those whose governing authority was established by way of a self-defined, self-administered, and self-regulated lineage. It is a process by which we the people would be forced to yield to their demands before ever gaining entry to that which is heavily taxed, employment is becoming more difficult to acquire, and increased wages only effect increased costs for the basic necessities of life... while they, as part of a "wealthening" elite, enjoy the spoils supplied through our different forms of Communistic, Democratic and Socialistic serfdoms that some prefer to denote as a modernized form of slavery.
In other words, they want to add yet another sugar-coated, preservative layered,
and artificially flavored idea to the illusion that we have a government that is
Of, By, and For
All the people.
The timidity of those who may well strive to go out of their way to interrupt our journey, impulsively urges them to waylay the courageousness of any budding curiosity and causes them to voice complaints against the initial outlines of a Cenocratic governing process. They prefer the presence of others doing as they themselves do and thinking as they themselves think, because such presumed "normal" and traditional behavior helps to reassure them that they are right in their views. They don't want anyone to begin charting a course into a new territory which does not mimic the boundaries of their world-view. In effect, you can't correctly color the page they set before you unless you remain in the lines so prescribed by their interests and beliefs. They want you to remain in your niche, regardless of how much you are suffering, because if everyone starts to alter their positions by adopting a new perspective, these self-assumed purveyors of knowing "The Way" might very well get lost (and start a revolution on their own behalf in an attempt to regain a desired functionality of their financial and other social status loses... in other words, regain a privileged form of liberty, justice and equality).
The antagonists to a Cenocratic perspective want everything and everyone to remain as they are because that is how they chart their respective life's course. But if a new course is charted, they want to be at the helm, and see it as "below their station" in life to participate in the laborings required for the initial undertaking of the journey. They prefer to stand on the shore lines with the expectation that all the initial crudeness of the course will be transitioned away to make their embarkation as comfortable as possible; so that they can be greeted and treated in the same richly rewarded manner they are accustomed to.
Such antagonists not only prefer that we conform to their perceived view of the world, but that we use the same words to describe their view. They want our "freedom of speech" expressions to be a mimicry of their own. They want to deny us the ability to create our own words, our own vocabulary, and the very placement of those words in a given structure for a given context. Neologisms such as Cenocracy, Cenocrat and Cenocratic are not permitted because they act as a kind of door-stop which permits in a breeze that might well change the stale odor of that which they have grown accustomed to... Like the stench of one's Toileting process which promotes the idleness of mind and body while waste products are permitted to accumulate instead of being routinely removed as they occur at their singular moment. They prefer that the next person, the next generation, (their heirs/"airs") be suffused with the same stench in an attempt to 'customate' them to perpetuating the same cycle of disregard for others. Such is the very same routine of mind and activity that present social governing processes are fostering as the best formulas for socialization.
More plainly stated, the typically occurring behavior of someone defecating is to let their waste products remain as stench-creating processes while they ruminate in idleness such as day dreaming, read, listen to surrounding sounds, talk on the phone, etc... Most people, it would seem from what can be determined by personally encountered experiences, is that they do not flush the toilet at any time during their Toileting procedure, just afterwards, though some do so as a means of removing that which was left by a previous user. While some may want to defensively claim they are conserving water, they don't understand that the situation highlights similar unseen "stench"-creating routines of thought and behavior brought about by the routine "user" processes of Communism, Democracy and Socialism; though some consider it a far stretch of the imagination to call such processes as "user friendly" after having been subjected to filling out some government forms. The word "stench" in this regard is metaphorical and is being used as a wide-ranging generality involving numerous types and kinds of "waste"-ful effects that most of us are routinely interpreting as natural, normal, and unavoidable... whereby no improvement in that which can improve one's thought and behavior are needed... or even exists.
But these stalwart protectors of the present governing faith don't want to be seen as harboring any rebellious tendencies by being one of the first to step in the water in undertaking the proposed Cenocratic voyage beyond the present routines of mind and behavior called Communism, Democracy or Socialism because they might get wet. And they think socially important personages would laugh at them by being made the butt of a community joke. They further submit that... anyway, it is a folly of mentation if either they or others would come to suggest that there is an agreeably alternative perspective to their presently accepted perceptions of "proper" social practices which they have been brought up to believe are the foremost expressions of liberty, justice and equality.
However, it should be noted that it is unfortunate we might have to expend some effort on those who would insist on persisting with a negative perspective to coincide with a prolonged and dominating pessimism they have for human affairs and humanity. They want all of humanity to share in their personal sorrows (but never their wealth or privileges), and help them to sustain as well as proliferate their negativity into a self-fulfilling death-dealing prophesy for all of existence... except their own of course. Some of them may in fact resort to extreme methods to "prove" they are right because their deliberately destructive actions are an example thereof!
For them, at these early Cenocratic stages, it is thought to be incomprehensible to think in terms of considering that there exists a governing formula which exceeds the current institutions; particularly one which portrays the possibility of a greater human promise and progress that can be apprehended by a human form of consciousness. They think that to exceed the grasp of our present social governing endeavours we must have the assistance of an extra-ordinary proposal originating from a source of super-normal appreciation, if not a divinity itself... or that all of humanity must have died and are on a journey towards Heaven which introduces us to its forth-coming role by way of an inculcation to a new way of thinking.
Oh poppycock! they might say... with an intent of interjecting a bit of humor by the usage of a phrase seldom used anymore as a means of imparting disapproval of that which they would prefer to interpret as the pixilated musings of an inebriated imagination. To them, such regards should be vehemently opposed, rejected and immediately discarded because it represents a path that will lead us all to a point of no return or cause us to quickly lose our present Communistic, Democratic or Socialistic way with no recognizable landmark, working compass, or even breeze to which we might hoist our social governing sails. They think our views are not suggestive of a Revolution in thinking, but that we have all simultaneously escaped from a Bedlam. And that our collective laughter to such is a confessed admission of a new form of madness that may be the creation of an unrecognized plague whose infection perpetrates a symptom obliquely described as Cenocracy... yet they never consider that they may be indulging in an expressed form of projection which is actually illustrating the very conditions called Communism, Democracy and Socialism!
Cenocrats on the other hand, realize that any new undertaking presents the possibility of risks; but history quickly reminds them that this is the way of progress, whether or not the initially sought for and defined goals are to be found. Very often, one excursion leads to a far greater discovery and even treasures that are not well understood until some time afterwards. And it is also well known that serendipitous events are sometimes the earmarks of fortuitous legends and breath-taking vistas of consciousness for which no contemporary imagination can foresee as the realization of achievable potentiality. Progress is not always readily visible or adaptable to current notions of practicality; it is sometimes subtle, ambiguous or an astonishing simplification of that which has been traditionally viewed as a take-for-granted artifact of complexity.
For some members of the gathering expedition, they may be unable to accurately tell you why they have joined the Cenocratic enterprise... all they can say is that "they have to" join, which for some may be interpreted along the same lines as a child's "just because" or "just wait, you'll see". And instead of a pen-knife hewn walking stick, some will bring paper and pen, or pencil (or a laptop), in order to record what they see in words, or in pictures, or both. Others may see themselves as a modern day version of an entrepreneurial Christopher (or "Christine") Columbus, seeking financial (or provisions) support for this new route by an encouraging vote of confidence by way of possible stock market advantages through advertising aligned with innovative thinking. And they will do such things despite those who may voice opposition; for they somehow know that they have been chosen to play a part in this historical event that is unfolding. They know that as more and more join in, the movement of individuals joined in unison produces a wave of momentum as clear as the sound of the ocean in a sea-shell.
For other members of the expedition into the Cenocratic unknowns, those whose lives have been tempered by the repeated hammerings and flames of personalized hells created by social circumstances permitted by the accepted legalities of present social governing models; they may at some time come face to face with the ending scenes of their life's drama in a circumstance which has forced them to stand with a back to a wall. For them, this is the final narrative of a senseless cinematic sequel that must be brought to a close by making sure all the actors are removed from their ability to ever again replay their distrustful roles. Such will be the moment of their true calling when they thrust everyone else aside from the line of fire... from whence emerges a beast of defiance singing a song of liberty only fellow Cenocrats understand. It is a monster of retribution which has lurked ever quietly below the surface and humanized to an acceptable level of civility by being assigned to a peripatetic pace of self control that, once unleashed, has not else to do but to charge their assailants and take out as many as they can in a blaze of all encompassing fire. Though they have prayed for the day to never come, and have been ever watchful not to participate in what may be described as a self-fulfilling prophesy; they know that realistically, the many forms of Communism, Democracy and Socialism engage in periodic experimental trials with their own beasts which they feed or starve according to the dictates of their usefulness in controlling a given population.
But in portraying the foregoing in a matter-of-fact way, they know their would-be adversaries will attempt to minimized their losses by making a first strike; little knowing it is part of a pre-formatted strategy which takes into consideration that their antagonists will try to out-position them. It is but a ploy to avail an unrealized advantage for accomplishing an unrealized objective. Magicians often employ the same tactic. (Mirror, Mirror, on the wall; Oh, so many more Mirrors if you should fall!)
The Cenocratic Movement is at the same time unnervingly exciting and apprehensively disconcerting because it portends to provide us with a social structure that will be a whole new Sociology, though some may simply refer to it as a New Democracy. Hence, for them, the Cenocratic Movement may be described as a Ceno-Democracy (variously pronounced CenoDemocracy, C-nod-emocracy, or simply Cenocracy). Its growing social undulations are like enlarging concentric waves that even disquiets the conscious slumberings of those who think themselves to be exercising some rebellious expression in their present actions or appearance. But many of them are merely engaged in actually describing little more a new form of collective "anti-establishment status quo", by navigating their present social structure in a determined, but conservatively rebellious way by using it as their main landmark of tethered orientation for their sanity.
In other words, their acts of self-interpreted rebellion are economically-defined social class attempts at representing some individual uniqueness that closely circumnavigates presently established rules of demeanor and expectation in their respective social sphere. Thus, a disturbance in the status quo of their presumed rebelliousness is like the tantrums of a child subjected to the loss of a security blanket, bottle, or regularized bathing schedule before being put to bed with a fairy-tale (called Communism, Democracy, or Socialism). In other words, their rebelliousness exercises its own form of sub, or aside-cultural status quo with which they identify themselves and those who do or do not share in similar forms of self-identity characterization. Their presumed "individuality" is attached to the dominant culture they are in contact with. If the dominant culture becomes disturbed, a loss in their "individualism" ensues.
The ideas being fostered by a "Cenocratic Revolution" can fill one with mixed emotions like a full-blow sail hoisted against an erratic wind which intermittently tugs tautly at the lines of perceptions thought to be the foremost expression of a coherent reality. But the ideas sink ever deeper into the core of one's being to help them remain firmly anchored against antagonistic social weatherings. For them, the ideas will reach such a crescendo of inner reverberation that their entire rationality will be transformed and they will see themselves as if they are re-living an historical moment already experienced in a previous life-time...
...Like some reincarnated episode linked to some underlying genetic predisposition that has been, by trial and error, like a dormant seed awaiting the proper environmental circumstances for an appropriate level of emergence; so that the next stage in an evolutionary trend can be realized. For them, Cenocracy is the reality of both a time and place they already live in, albeit having been, like a plant, pruned time and again by the faulty forms of ("horticultural governance") being practiced by past and current forms of government. And though they readily understand the usage of the present metaphors in context, those who are close to them; existing in a world shared by a common mentality, may accept— but not understand them. Such is the case for all those who venture into the uncharted territory called Cenocracy. They see things differently for they are part of a future breed in the making.
Humanity has had a long, historically documented, gestation period in its ascendancy towards experiencing an ever greater realization. The different business, political and religious forms of Communism, Democracy, Dictatorship, Monarchy, Plutocracy, Socialism, etc., have been but kicks from within the womb no matter what location is viewed as the Cradle of Humanity. From this perspective, it can be stated that Cenocracy is the birthing process whose after-birth remnants are the many traditions and beliefs falsely presumed to be so important to a "true" existence on Earth and afterwards. From yet another perspective, the many forms of social self-governing can be paralleled with the stench of dirty diapers and Cenocracy as a toilet training methodology. Such metaphors are necessary not only to knock the arrogance of humanity off its unabashed high hobby horse riding, but to prepare for attendance at a school that it never knew existed... or could even imagine.
History is replete with examples of missed opportunity for individuals, for groups, for nations. While Cenocracy may not be viewed retrospectively from the future as "The" ultimate apotheosis, it is an opportunity enabling humanity to explore the possibilities of potentials yet to be realized, but achievable. Time will tell who would and those who would not take advantage of it.