Cenocracy: A Non-Voting Protest option page 2
The Non-Voting Protest Option
Page 2

Collect all non-voting efforts
into a single, national and very public protest

{and if this doesn't work to bring about progressive change,
then more Revolutionary options can be utilized}

Non-Votion Protest option page 1 Non-Votion Protest option page 2

Flag Counter
Visitors as of 11/11/2019

The Nonvoter Myth
The Myth of the Lazy Non-Voter

Though we humbly implore all military and para-military personnel to please stand down in order to stand up for our right to create a government which best suits our collective ideas and ideals as a precedent stipulated in the first Declaration of Independence; a refusal on their part to do so will oblige us the necessity of interpreting their denial as a deliberate assault on our Inalienable Right of Independence— and will signify We The People are in a state of (cold) War with the Government... and the shot previously heard around the world will be fired again because once was not enough to insure the people against the imperialisms wrought by those whose Capitalistic endeavours are pronouncements of egregious pursuits with little interest in the effects it has on the lives of the many just so a few might be enabled to legally steal the last morsel of resource to feed a gluttonous spirit. It is a disgusting religion of personalized economics the rich want to force the poor into sharing a belief in, and that those who are able... must fight against.

Unfortunately, though we prefere non-violent methods to bring about corrective, positive and progressive political and social change, many have reached the impasse of the realization that the only productive form of protest involves the killing of not one or two, but multiple targets of obstinance. While Trump and his supporters think they have gained a victory by the disgusting placement of Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court, it is the same attitude that was felt by those in the Ancient Roman government as it was deteriorating under their noses.

Einstein's Vote against Voting

Stop participating in a corrupt and rigged system!

Occupy All Ballot Boxes!
Wendy McElroy's quote on voting
Act Responsibly: Don't Vote

David MCelroy's don't vote banner
If you participate in sham of voting, you’re responsible for what it creates
Voting perspectives image 1 Voting perspectives image 2
Banner display on acidrayn.com
Stop Voting For Masters To Rule Over You... Or You'll Always Be A Slave
Pew Research Center Poll
Pew Research Center, U.S. Politics & Policy
Every generation has its cannon fodder Shooting at lame ducks blindfolded


I don't vote protest button

Let us be clear, while we find it admirable that there are others who have taken the initiative to think for themselves by not following the herd mentality when it comes to blind-sighted voting, but simply not voting is not a productive enough protest against an identifiably corrupt and rigged system. The action of "NOT VOTING" must be aligned with a nationally recognized protest that seeks definitive changes in the form and function of government. Every single venue of voting must be boycotted by an "occupy" effort that overshadows the previous marches which left the public in a state of bewilderment when trying to figure out what the 'Occuparkists' wanted to specifically accomplish except for the letting off of vociferous steam and the venting of emotionally-laden personal narratives. (The word "occuparkists" is used because several of the groups occupied parks.)

If we have to drag the government by the throat to a social self-governance bargaining table while it is kicking, spitting, biting, and screaming out threats and obscenities, you must be willing to commit yourself to the duration and not give in to the rantings of a problem child that will act like a spoiled rich kid when it doesn't get its way. If the government is too feral of a child, as many already believe it to be, and it can not be domesticated to the Will Of The People, we can not permit the child to wreak havoc on our lives by allowing it to live unsupervised. While there are many issues which need to be addressed, we can similarly protest initially for the same ones such as getting rid of the Electoral College, 20 year retroactive term limits for all government employees, strict campaign finance reforms, strict lobbying rules, no wage or benefits increases for Congress or any Congress assigned tasks..., etc... without the direct approval of the people who are to be permitted to establish their own Peoples Legislative Branch.

We Can Do This... You Must Believe In Yourselves!

If you tell someone that you don't vote, they may or may not say anything, though one or another may wonder to themselves how you can possibly think this way when they have been brought up to believe that voting is the main, sole, superior and legal way in which to bring about change. People actually believe that their singular vote combined with others can bring about change... and it does, but not in the respect implied by the desired reforms which will definitively resolve the many issues the people want addressed. It is not only to get people off their conveyor belt inclinations and motivations for voting, just as it is get those off their conveyor belt mentality of not voting... with respect to using it as a useless form of protest like marching down the middle of a street with a sign or banner, that only a few may read. Those who vote and those who don't vote have both got to change their tactics if they want to bring about actual reforms beyond a mere exchange of one politician for another. Only by showing that non-voting can bring about progressive change for the better will we be able to claim more adherents to our Cenocratic (New Government) Cause.

A few more Links:

And some more Links:


The following video is not for mature, intelligent, and informed viewers.

It is clear to us that the forthcoming lineup of Status Quo Representatives have read so many scripts in their lives they are unable to actually think for themselves beyond an indulgence in mimicking the mannerisms and maligned misguided delusions running rampant in the American Culture and elsewhere. Do they actually want the public to persist in participating in a way of life which indulges a level of idiocy that believes what they say has any respectful logic? It is astonishing to find so very many misinformed people who have not yet learned to live outside the concocted fairy tales in which they spend so much of their working time... and has now shown that their played-in make-believe worlds have intrusively entered their day-to-day existence as well.

The public is dumbfounded and disappointed to find so many deluded perceptions being voiced from the same corner of the entertainment industry and hope this is not a common dementia amongst other industry venues. It is supremely regrettable— to find so very many whose personal talents have brought so much value to the minds and hearts of millions— have constructed a type of reasoning that reflects a pathetic rationale incongruous to the development of an intellectual incentive wanting to create a National Movement where actual and honest reform takes place instead of the scripted lies, excuses and disfranchising dismissiveness heard so often from all political candidates once they get into office. It is extremely embarrassing for all of us who have held so many entertainers in such high regard, that we must present the following video as a disgusting assortment of those who share the same clueless appreciation of the public's growing collectivity against a status quo government that is out of touch with the pathetic political reality the people have been oppressively forced to endure so much nonsense... and has infected the lives of those who should know better. The old "Lights! Camera! Action!" adage is now heard as "Darkness in a Chamber of mindless Conformity."

This is a Generic Ballot for a Despotic form of Government

this is a generic despotic government ballot

This is a generic ballot which may contain other specifically-listed political parties depending on the context of a given election.

A person who wants to use their vote to "make a statement" typically does so by selecting the candidate whom they think is the lesser of two or more evils. This formula of using the ballot to "voice their opinion" is little more than a continued participation in the election system of a Despotic government. It makes little difference whom you vote in with the desire to bring about actual reforms when the overall political system is rigged against the people having a collective voice to effect desired and desperately needed reforms in the fundamental functioning of the overall government process. Everyone must stop voting in order for their voice to be collectively heard. The people will get the reforms they want or the people will stop participating in a system that refuses to abide by the collective Will of the Population, and not just a minority of eligible voters who help to perpetuate the disgusting Despotism currently being practiced. In an effort to get needed reforms, a progressive three-step philosophy can be initiated (because a Despotic government has no real interest in practicing real equality or a real democracy... without being able to rig the system so that a Few can take advantage of the Many.

In the present despotically-organized-democracy, funding for public services is compulsory through taxes which are often not equalized between individuals and corporations or the rich versus the poor. Most services have an underlying economic-based orientation (such as roads used for commercial activities and schools/training for employment). But not all services are used by all people or the services only "service" a particular population according to some standard such as a sport or exercise routinization... and in some cases, there is an attached "user" fee on top of the taxes the people have been forced to pay... very often without the approval of the majority of citizens— because the voting system is not set up to identify the collective voice of the people, only the "majority-few" who vote. And even if the people vote against a measure, the government can step in to override the vote of the people if the government thinks that a service is needed. (For example, years ago the people of Salt Lake voted against the Trax system but the government chose to ignore the voice of the people... and some people still don't understand why there is a growing population of people who have given up on voting because the current system of voting is despotic and not democratic.) The government can effect an "eminent domain" rationale on anything it wants and the people have no say so whatsoever... unless they engage in riots, rebellion and/or Revolution. When the public seeks a redress of grievance, the despotic government's ludicrous response is to provide for a pathetic "ballot initiative" practice that is plagued with the same bureaucratic nonsense the people are already subjected to!

America's Despotic Formula of Democracy

It is difficult for someone to recognize they are living under a Representative Despotic system of governance when they have been brought up to believe they are living in a system labeled as a "Representative democracy". The inability to recognize the reality is compounded into a larger problem when educators who are aware of the falsehood, are unable to express the "negative" truth and are forced... at the threat of a job loss, to continue teaching students the same "positive" illusion/delusion their parents and grandparents were brought up to believe in. The traditions of ignorance must be held up at all costs!

This is a Generic Ballot For
a Real Democratic Formula of Government

a real democratic ballot

For those who value their ability to vote as a precious commodity related to their Inalienable Rights, then every voting ballot should have a means by which a person's vote can make an actual difference by providing the option for their vote to be cast as a recognizable protest whose grievance must be redressed to the satisfaction of the public because the conventional means of protest have shown themselves to be routinely dismissed without the public having an adequate alternative to recourse themselves with. The idea that a ballot is to be used for a single idea is anti-thetical to the fact that the consciousness of the public is far more complex than this practiced antiquity of simplistic interest and experience— and needs a means by which an old idea can be transformed into a viability equal to the needs of the time period in which a given idea is practiced. The ballot box of old is too antiquated for the needs of a modern society whose formula of government has not kept pace with a growing population's need for either adapting the old with a new set of standards, or creating a new process to handle multiple tasks at once... just like employees are being asked to do by employers whose "business as usual" is several generations removed from the horse, plow, and scythe, ... which the present system of elections and voting is stubbornly reticent to give up because of an emotionalized tradition out of step with the beat of a progressive drum wanting to join into an orchestra of future possibility.

None Of The Above
  • Why aren't the people allowed to have "none of the above" automatically placed on every ballot in order to convey to government officials their growing dissatisfaction with their arrogance, lies, and lack of true leadership skills?

Conscientious Voter Objection

  • Why can't there be a "conscientious objector" provision similar to that permitted in the military because the situation with elections is a disgusting testament to a practiced irrationality?

I Invoke My Right to Vote In Protest!!!

And if the government doesn't give the people these three options on every ballot, (because they refuse to address the many social issues to the satisfaction of the people), then the people will have to take in their own red stamp with one (or all) of the three remarks in order to stamp the ballot sheets so that every single ballot box will be a collective voice of the people in protest! Yet better still, let We The People of the entire Nation speak as one by not voting at all!

Why can't the voting process be used as a method of effective protest when all other avenues of attempting to get issues effectively addressed are examples of an "open door policy" of government in the form of a revolving door experienced in different ways by different people?

revolving door image 1 revolving door image 2 revolving door image 3

The current forms of voting Ballot being routinely supplied to the public are the designs created by Despotic governments which forces the people to participate in a rigged system that does not permit the public to have their own voice via a Peoples Legislative Branch... so that the people can effect reforms that the Despotic government refuses to make— and creates excuses for not doing so in order to perpetuate its despotism under the guise of a presumed democracy. Despotic governments have no interest in practicing effective democracies with full measures of equality which guarantee a Full Wage and Benefits package of our Inalienable Rights! Instead, they want to hold our Inalienable Rights hostage!

It would be wonderful if we could have a 'heart-to-heart' talk with our Representatives who would then make the necessary changes in order to deal effectively with the issues we want addressed. However, it is because conventional methods of peaceful protest are ineffectual that we are being forced to construct a progressive system of non-cooperation against a system that is disregarding the Will of the people, and that a "ballot initiative" is a sucker and bandaid approach for public participation. The very fact that we are looking for a way to increase public participation in the governing process tells us that the system needs to be reformed... that is, restructured. The government must be made full aware that we mean business. Enough marching down streets and finding ourselves at a dead end. Enough of trying to contact Representatives that have their own personal agendas. Enough of the ludicrous "petition the government" nonsense. There has been enough talk, enough hand-holding, enough of the kum-ba-yaish sing-along street chants, etc... let's do something about the corrupt system. A despotic government like that of the U.S. will intentionally let the public suffer in order for it to give in, give up, and give out instead of addressing the issues the public wants to have resolved according to the Will of the People.

Initial Tier:

  1. A National Boycott of all elections. (Do not give in to bribes, scare tactics, manipulated patriotisms, threats, specious conciliations, etc... Replacing one political candidate for another who find themselves in an unworkable system is waste of time and plainly stupid.) Cooperatively participating in a system only serves to perpetuate it, like a dog chasing its own tail.

  2. Refusal to pay Federal Taxes (States should prepare to keep the money. If States give the money to the Federal government, all taxes from the State will be withheld as well.)

  3. Shut down the entire Capitalist system. (Stock pile supplies against the protracted stubbornness of a Despotic government that has no interest in effecting reforms in accordance with the Will of the People. It will use every dirty trick at its disposal to get the public to bend to its Will so that it can continue to subjugate the Many by a Few.)

Secondary Tier:

  1. Targeted Riots (corporate financials, government communications/media propaganda, etc...)
  2. Riotous Rebellion (minor armaments against specific targets)
  3. Revolution (full armamentation against specific targets)

Tertiary Tier:

  1. Destroying all politically-oriented monuments, street signs, building inscriptions, etc... (Overall infrastructure is to be left intact... unless we are given no choice but to do otherwise.)
  2. Attacking (subduing) specific Corporate and Civic leaders.
  3. Confiscation of all government activities on behalf of the people to effect a better government.

  1. Although well-intentioned, those at the "Common Cause" organization are misguided. The fact that the people are forced to engage in a "lobbying" effort to effect social-political reforms/reconstructions is a clear indication that a lousy version of a "peoples government" is permitted to exist. Those connected with Common Cause are participating in efforts to perpetuate the present formula of despotism, despite claiming their philosophy is to make changes by "working the system". By becoming used to working with the system as it is, they become institutionalized to it and perpetuate it because this is how they have learned to maneuver themselves in its many labyrinthine corridors.

  2. Because there are millions of people who fully acknowledge that the current political system is rigged against the Will of the People in effecting necessary reforms, the word "reform" has been reconstituted to reflect the need for a "restructuring" of government. The people must stop participating in the system and introduce graded measures of non-cooperation in an effort to bring about such corrective measures as for example: (1) Instituting a Peoples Legislative Branch [a Peoples Cenocratic (new government) Congress] (2) a removal of the Electoral College, (3) 20-year retroactive maximum term/employment limits for all government employees (4) Strict campaign finance reforms (5) Revamping the entire voting system such as standardizing it Nation wide and Reinstitutionalizing those who have served their time in a Penal institution (and those serving) (6) stoping the ability of Congress from being able to vote itself a raise and Cost Of Living Benefits benefits without public approval (7) addressing all issues (environmental, animal, education, health, insurance, abortion, vaccination, sexual orientation, woman's rights, etc...) to the satisfaction of the public.

  3. There is a desperate need for the people to effect their own "Peoples Legislative Congress" because of so many social issues going unaddressed, and that no conventional means of protest assists the public in getting a redress of grievances to their satisfaction. If those in government have answers to issues, they must then be viewed as deliberately denying the public their application, or that they actually do not have a clue as to what to do, or that they too are bogged down by a system of government that no longer works for the best interests of the public. No matter what excuse is put forth, all of them provide evidence of a corrupted system... without needing to place blame... since it is more important to correct mistakes creating such a disability. A government that works as a disabled system forces everyone and everything to make accommodations to its growing deformity which cripples the prospective gains of future peoples, like the binding of feet or breasts, creating traumas from circumcision, skull flattening, and other superstitious irrationalism sometimes excused by arguments referencing tradition. The people must be able to participate in its own self-governance on a full time basis, without all the bureaucratic obstructionism now in place (or as is suggested by a "ballot initiative" which is an extension of the despotic system), in order that the people themselves become a legalized formidable checks-and-balances measure against the existing branches of government who frequently work together as one branch against the best interests of the majority.

  4. Although one might suspect it as Well-meaning, those groups that advocate a reduction in the size of government are not taking into consideration that a "peoples government" relates to a given population of a Nation. Hence, a large population is, by its very size, a BIG government... In other words, the present government is not BIG enough to the extent that the people themselves do not have an effective means of participating in Self-Governance on a full-time basis in order to effect a "full wage and benefits" practice of their Inalienable Rights as defined by Self-Representation and Self-Determination. While those who advocate a reduction in the size of government by way of expecting the cooperation of the population at "large," they do not see this usage of the public as a contradiction nor hypocrisy to their "small" claims. In other words, while they want a BIG population of voters to agree with them to reduce the size of government according to their singular strategy, they don't want this same BIG population to interfere with their interests in running the government as a FEW see fit to do so without having to consult the BIG population unless it is a means by which they can run the government according to the interests of a FEW.

  5. Those advocating a "ballot initiative" in an effort to establish a means by which the people themselves can participate in their own "self-governance", is a foolhardy gesture in that this method insures that the people are forced to submit to current mechanisms of governance as a decisionary go-between which is another flavor of the current despotic government arrangement already in place.

Here is an example of a Ballot Initiative process for the State of California:

The ballot initiative process gives California citizens a way to propose laws and constitutional amendments without the support of the Governor or the Legislature. A simplified explanation of the initiative process follows.

Steps for an Initiative to become Law

  1. Write the text of the proposed law (initiative draft).
  2. Submit initiative draft to the Attorney General for official title and summary. *
  1. Initiative petitions are circulated to collect enough signatures from registered voters.
  2. Signatures are turned into county election officials for verification.
  3. Initiative will either be Qualified for Ballot or be failed by the Secretary of State, after verifications and deadline dates.
  4. California voters will approve or deny the qualified Ballot Initiative.

Detailed information about the complete initiative process, petition circulation deadlines and signature requirements can be found in the Secretary of State's "How to Qualify an Initiative".

* One of the many responsibilities of the Attorney General is to prepare a title and summary for proposed initiative measures prior to the circulation of qualification petitions. State law requires a proponent to furnish the Attorney General's Office with the complete text of a proposed initiative measure for preparation of an official title and summary. The proposed measure must be submitted with required certifications, and a $2000 filing fee, which is refunded if the measure qualifies for an election ballot.

In comparison to that above, here is the same process subjected to a "cleansing" of its despotic character for the proposed "Peoples Legislative Branch". It is not meant to be viewed as "THE" exact formula by which the Peoples Legislative Branch will operate:

  1. Either a proposer themselves, someone they choose or someone via the PLB can Write up the text of a proposed discussion (initiative draft).
  2. Submit initiative draft or idea to the Peoples Legislative Branch.

  • Active Measures are proposed initiatives.
  • There are no "Inactive Measures", only a prioritizing process of selectivity (the quantity of people requesting that a certain issue be discussed and voted on will determine roster placement unless there is extenuating circumstances requiring one issue to be discussed and voted on earlier than its roster placement).

  1. Initiative petitions do not require signatures, but all petitions may be subjected to a "triage" method of selection in order for the people to address the more outstanding National issues. Petitions involving State issues must be sent to the State and the petitioner notified.

  2. Any petition can be submitted by anyone in the country, whether they are a citizen or not. Good ideas do not have to meet a "citizen voter" requirement. If this were the case for all ideas, then many of the technologies we have today would not be permitted entry into our lives for consideration of value.

  3. No Initiative can be disqualified by any government official. Any Initiative that is to be disqualified by any PLB member must be placed before the public for approval.

  4. Voters will propose how the issue of an Initiative is to be resolved. (Voter registration needs to be updated Nation wide. All permanent as well as temporary residents should be permitted to vote even if you are not classified as a "citizen". Some homeless people do not want to register as a homeless person because they feel they will be targeted by one government authority or another just by identifying themselves as being homeless. While a person may be homeless, they do not want to be stigmatized as such nor placed into a category of bureaucratically-designed institutionalization akin to a debtors prison with a "catch-22" formula as outlined in the satirical novel by Joseph Heller.)

    (The "catch" in Catch-22 involves a mysterious Air Force regulation which asserts that a man is considered insane if he willingly continues to fly dangerous combat missions, but that if he makes the necessary formal request to be relieved of such missions, the very act of making the request proves that he is sane and therefore ineligible to be relieved. The term catch-22 thereafter entered the English language with the meaning "a problematic situation for which the only solution is denied by a circumstance inherent in the problem" and later developed several additional senses... Source: "Catch-22." Encyclopædia Britannica Ultimate Reference Suite, 2013.)

  5. Issues involving Constitutional or Bill of Rights matters may require the Constitution and/or Bill of Rights to be redesigned... according to the Will of the People.

  6. There is no filing Fee. Not everyone with a good idea has money. Requiring a filing fee disfranchises those who live hand-to-mouth.

  7. No government official can select which proposal for discussion is acceptable or not. The government will not participate as a "middle man".

  8. There are No (obstructive) deadlines or signature requirements. Anybody can take as long as they want to prepare a proposal, but it won't be discussed until such time as it has achieved some measure of intelligibility and 'discursive legibility'.

The primary responsibility of the Peoples Legislative Branch will be to assist the public in its efforts to bring about corrective changes that the typical process of government does not, can not or will not address for the satisfaction of the Public Will. Their attention is not divided by a supernumerary amount of Responsibilities where the needs of the public are prioritized according to some time, signatures, fees requirements... etc...

  1. In brief: A viable alternative to the "ballot initiative" proposal is the establishment of a "Peoples Legislative Branch" as a full-time publicly administered checks -and- balances formula. One man, One, woman, and one worker will be randomly selected from each of the states who will manage their own lists of self-designated contenders. There purpose will be to administrate any issue on the Federal level that the people want to have discussed by the public. After a national discussion, a vote will be rendered to select the ways and means of addressing a given issue. The result will then be sent to the Congress for approval or alternative suggestions. If the people do not want to incorporate any changes, the people do not have to. The peoples vote will also go to the President for his/her/their view. If both the President and Congress reject the measure stipulated by the people and there are no Constitutional grounds for inadmissibility, the people can then vote their measure into law. Those who are selected for the Peoples Legislative Branch will not be the voice of the people. They will insure a collection and collation of issues to be discussed, assist in the monitoring of discussions, render the appropriate measures for a vote and then submit it to the other branches. There is no go-between the people and the government by the usage of a Peoples Legislative Branch.

  2. The present formula of "democracy" being practiced in the world is a concealed form of despotism tied into the way the people are voting. It is rather naive of us to think that just because we have a right to vote that this right is an effective means by which we can make things right for all of us. In order for the people to readily see that the presiding government does not want to create a greater level of democracy involving an increased "wage and benefits package" of our Inalienable Rights, or that current political memberships do not have a clue as to what needs to be done to resolve numerous issues the people want addressed... the people must force the government's hand with three step-wise progressive tactics which amount to not participating— non-cooperation in the continuance of the present despotism, because in so doing, the predictable behavior of a despotic government will become manifest. Governments practicing a low level form of democracy resort to tactics such as either keeping one or another group of people from voting or forcing it to vote as a "compulsory duty". Our voting traditions need to be looked at in an extended (but brief) detail:

  1. The people won their Inalienable rights (i.e. their "property") upon achieving independence in 1783. However, the people did not get a full "wage and benefits package" of these rights saliently noted by the (lst) absence of an ability to vote, (2nd) an absence of Self-Representation and (3rd) an absence of Self-Determination. While the Inalienable Right of voting has been secured for most people, only those in Legislative positions are permitted to exercise a collective form of Self-Representation and Self-Determination. These three rights were confiscated in 1783 by the fledgling government who gave the people an I.O.U. for their deference (that Legislators used to secure ulterior motives for themselves); to make good on its promise that everyone was entitled to their Inalienable Rights in due course of the government's maturity, but that this property was actually confiscated by the government, and two-thirds of it remains in the hands of a government that is trying to reconfiscate the terms by which people may vote, because of gerrymandering and the Electoral College... not to mention the fact that the people are more frequently being subjected to a lineup of political candidates that they must choose the lesser of two or more evils from. In short, the people must collectively cash-in their I.O.U's and receive a full wage and benefits package of their Inalienable Rights. The right of "eminent domain" nor civil asset forfeiture applies in this context of property ownership. Wars have been fount over much less. The Government must return our property that it has as a hostage being used to mortgage a ransom paid for with servitude, dependency and exploitation.

  2. The inherited endowment of Inalienable Rights constitutes real property that is legally owned by each person whose entitlement was temporarily transferred by a an IOU promissory note form of "power of attorney", but never actually returned to their Full Ownership upon the maturity of the deed as designated by the growth and development of the government's ability to pay a full wage and benefits package... and has instead been used to effect both a modern day economic formula of a debtor's imprisonment and a 'redemptory payments' imposition authorized under the provisionary decree of 'citizenship'. The property of the public is being held as a hostage by the government demanding that an ongoing ransom be paid by various means such as an indentured servitude (because no equal payment of resources is allotted) and a protracted dependency (in order for a subsistence level of rights to be permitted under provisions such as 'civil rights' and those contained in various amendments); thus revealing the liability of the government to give redress for the injuries the public has sustained by an agreement which has since been rendered into a circumstance resembling theft which obscene's the notions of good faith and fair dealing, and therefore constitutes a breach-of-contract verified by the assented witness of the many millions of public persons (citizens, etc...) who have experienced affliction because of the neglect in rendering unto the people what is rightfully theirs.

Again, let us ask that all Military and Para-military Law Enforcement personnel STAND DOWN in order to STAND UP for the right of the people to have the government which they collectively think suits them best, and reflects the precedent set in the Declaration of Independence.

Date of Origination: Tuesday, 6th-February-2018... 6:52 AM
Date of Initial Posting: Tuesday, 6th-Feb-2018... (approx.) 8:11 AM
Latest Updated Posting: Friday, 10th April 2021... 1:46 PM